VISUAL NEWSLETTER –
FEB 2005
Novell’s best operating system, in my estimation, was
introduced way back in 1993. It offered an admirable combination of performance
and simplicity that has yet to be duplicated by Microsoft or Novell
themselves.
Netware versions 5.1 through 6.5 do have a lot more
features and abilities where wide area networking, the internet and e-mail
integration are concerned. For most companies however, this is something of a
mute point since reliable highspeed Internet and inter-company e-mail is
available through various outside sources such as Bell & Rogers to name a
few.
The new versions come into their own when integrating
multiple sites into one company network. For most small to medium sized
companies, this is not an issue. They want reliable and fast file and printer
sharing. As long as Internet and e-mail resources are provided, the network is
doing its job. Data can always be exchanged between divisions via e-mail, fax
and non-electronic methods.
The difficulty that Novell Netware 3.12 is now
encountering is that it is no longer an actively supported product. As such,
the recent introduction of SATA hard drive technology has thrown it for a loop.
Starting in 2005 almost all new file servers from Dell, HP, Compaq and such
will use this new drive technology. From a server standpoint it makes sense. It
allows the easy connection of multiple hard drives and the activation of raid
disk technologies at the flip of a switch.
Novell 3.12
unfortunately, does not have the necessary disk drivers to allow it to work
with the newer drive types. Novell has no plans to create these drivers, so
that leaves us in a difficult situation. Server upgrades and replacement
servers will be limited to those computers still utilizing older technologies.
This situation will require a little planning.
The
options for file servers and networks come down to the following. We must plan
to retain our existing servers and operating systems or we must upgrade them.
If
you choose to stay with your existing server / operating system, plans should
be made to handle the situation should your existing file server fail. We know
that we cannot use a newer model server to replace an existing one. This means
that we are limited to an older model of server or a workstation that still
utilizes the older drive technologies. At present this limits our options but
replacement is still possible.
Older
model servers are in limited supply in the used computer marketplace. A new
workstation pressed into operation as a server may be the best bet. I have
employed good quality workstations over the years with good results. In either
case this must still be considered a stop-gap measure as newer technologies are
starting to appear in a number of quality workstations as well.
Novell
is still a possible server option but it is now so complicated that it requires
specially certified technicians to install it.
In
smaller networks with up to 10 workstations it is possible to use Windows XP
Professional as a basic file server. This works well as long as you do not
attach printers to the file server. All versions of Windows designed for
workstations do not share files and printers well at the same time.
For
more complex networks we are recommending that you migrate to Microsoft Windows
Server 2003. This is Microsoft’s most reliable file server product. We have
several users converted to this platform with little or no side affects. It
does require all workstations to be upgraded to Windows 2000 or Windows XP Professional.